Allowed

Sushama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jul 2024CR. MISC./18335/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to a female petitioner filing Cr.M.C. No.18335 of 2024 in a cheating case arising from a money dispute, releasing her on bail bonds within six weeks subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail within six weeks by furnishing bond of one lakh rupees and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Sushama Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18335 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2022 Thana- BATHNAHA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sushama Kumari SON OF Sri Jai Kishor Singh RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKAMALDAH, PS- BATHNAHA, DIST- SITAMARHI

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

The State of Bihar BIHAR =====================	Versus ... ... Opposite Party/s =================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :	Mr. Ravi Ranjan
For the Opposite Party/s : For the Informant ; =====================	Mr. Anil Prasad Singh Mr. Santosh Kumar =================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

5 19-07-2024

¶9

Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

As per the FIR, the petitioner and another co-accused took a loan of Rs.6,00,000/- from the informant on the pretext of marriage of his daughter. When the informant demanded his money back, the petitioner assured to get him job at Health Department and also handed over a forged appointment letter to him. Thereafter, the informant again started demanding his money back but the petitioner did not returned the same.

¶12

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18335 of 2024(5) dt.19-07-2024 2/2

¶14

the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶16

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as the petitioner is a lady and there is money dispute between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No.318 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶17

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶18

shikha/-

¶19

U T

Sushama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sushama Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shubham Kumar Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Zahid Iqbal Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Moinul Haque Vs The State of Bihar

Lal Babu Kumar@ Lal Babu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sheopujan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sulekha Singh Vs the State of Bihar