Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application; the High Court accorded permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29685 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2016 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Raghunath Rai S/o Banwari Rai @ Vanwari Ray, R/o Vill. - Jagdishpur, P.S. - Raghopur, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
to withdraw this application.
withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Raghunath Rai
The State of Bihar
Navin Kumar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
