Quashing application under challenge to an FIR alleging injury from a trivial drain dispute was withdrawn with liberty to raise all contentions at the stage of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3086 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
RAMOUTAR YADAV @ RAMAWTAR YADAV Late Parmeshwar Prasad Yadav resident of Near Cold storage behind the arigation colony jabaripur, P.S-Tilkamanjhi,Distt.-Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anupa Nand Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 29-01-2024
learned APP for the State along with learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2, Mr. Ansh Prasad.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3086 of 2019(3) dt.29-01-2024 2/2
of the O.P. No. 2 submits that if what has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that can be raised at the stage of framing of charge, on which the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise all issues at the time of framing of charge.
4. Accordingly, the present quashing application
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Ramoutar Yadav @ Ramawtar Yadav
State Of Bihar
Chitralekha Singh Nagendra Kumar Singh
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
