Dismissed

Lalan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 May 2024CR. MISC./27439/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the petitioner's anticipatory bail application due to an inordinate delay of eight years in approaching the Court. However, the Court directed that if the petitioner surrendered within four weeks, the trial court should consider his status as a brother-in-law and dispose of the matter expediently.

What did the court decide?

None. Anticipatory bail rejected. Permission to surrender granted with direction for expedited hearing.

Lalan Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27439 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2013 Thana- KHIRHAR District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lalan Thakur Son of Ram Sresth Thakur @ Ram Sreth Thakur Resident of Village Bhola Baingra Jiraul, P.S. Khirhar, District- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 21-05-2024 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No. 01 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A) and 506 of the I.P.C. lodged on 06.01.2013 by the informant, Sushma Devi.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that her husband and brother-in-law assaulted her and she was also ousted from her in-laws’ house for want of dowry. Accordingly, the FIR.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is brother-in-law and has no role to play in the alleged dispute between the couple.

¶16

Learned APP, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh on the other hand pointed out that the FIR was lodged in the year 2013,

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27439 of 2024(2) dt.21-05-2024 2/2

¶18

charge-sheet submitted and the bailable warrant issued against the petitioner in the year 2016, he has come to this Court after eight years.

¶19

Taking into account, the inordinate delay in approaching the Court, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

¶20

However, if the petitioner surrenders within four weeks from today, the Court concerned shall take up the matter considering the fact that he is brother-in-law and dispose of the same preferably on the same day.

¶21

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶22

Adnan/-

Lalan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalan Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Sunder @ Bittu @ Shyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Rai @ Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikesh Kumar @ Bhutkun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mukul Kumar @ Mukul Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Aakash Kumar Keshri @ Aakash Keshari Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar