Bail application by a petitioner in judicial custody in Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 171 of 2022, accused with 12 family members of rioting, house trespass and firing that injured the informant's brother. The court declined relief given the allegation against him and rejected the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16092 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2022 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali
======================================================
Kundan Rai @ Kundan Kumar Son of Loha Rai @ Shiv Kumar Rai Resident of Village- Terasiya, Police Station- Ganga Bridge, in the district of Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Supriya Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 17-05-2024
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16092 of 2024(3) dt.17-05-2024 2/2
house of informant and looted jewellery and cash Rs. 10,000/-. Thereafter, the accused persons fired in air and fled away. Accordingly, the FIR.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner in custody for offences under IPC and the Arms Act should be released on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kundan Rai @ Kundan Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
