Birendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26136 of 2024

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali

======================================================

Birendra Singh Son of Prabhu Singh, Residence of Village- GovindpurSinghara, Police Station- Mahua, District- Vaishali, Pin Code- 844126.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 07-05-2024 Heard Mr. Abhay Kumar, the learned counsel for

¶12

the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahua PS Case No. 401 of 2022, FIR dated 19.06.2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

According to prosecution case, the daughter of the informant, who is married to one Nagendra Singh informed her telephonically that her life is in danger and on the very next day her son-in-law called her and informed that her daughter has been murdered. It is further alleged that when the informant went to the sasural of her daughter, she found the door locked.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26136 of 2024(3) dt.07-05-2024 2/4

¶16

It is further alleged that she identified the dead body kept in the hospital for post-mortem as her daughter namely, Shabnam Kumari.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the ground that petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased. He further submits that upon perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner and husband of the deceased namely, Nagendra Singh is in judicial custody since 27.08.2022 and he is facing trial vide Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2023 and petitioner is living separately from the family members of the deceased.

¶18

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the other hand has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent, there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act against him and the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial Court, within a period of four weeks from the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26136 of 2024(3) dt.07-05-2024 3/4

¶21

date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Vaishali at Hajipur, where the case is pending in connection with Mahua PS Case No. 401 of 2022 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:

¶22

(i). Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the trial Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the trial Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the trial Court.

¶23

(ii). If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(iii). And further condition that the trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the trial Court shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26136 of 2024(3) dt.07-05-2024 4/4

¶26

shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Shahnawaz/-

¶29

U T

Birendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Adarsh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramdev Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Bhogendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sakil Sah @ Shakil Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar