Partly allowed

Bhogendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 May 2024CR. MISC./24401/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application by grandmother of co-accused in a kidnapping and rape FIR. Petitioner no. 1's application was permitted to be withdrawn. Granting anticipatory bail to petitioner no. 2 for lack of specific allegations and her clean antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner no. 2 (Buchani Devi) released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties; application of petitioner no. 1 dismissed as withdrawn.

Bhogendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24401 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2023 Thana- ARER District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bhogendra Paswan S/o Late Chhotkan Paswan R/o vill - Dhakjari, P.S. - Arer, Distt. - Madhubani

¶5

Buchani Devi W/o Late Chhotkan Paswan R/o vill - Dhakjari, P.S. - Arer, Distt. - Madhubani

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Shobha Devi W/o Mangal Mehtar R/o vill - Dhakjari, Tower Chouk, P.S. - Arer, Distt. - Madhubani

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 06-05-2024 Heard Mr. Ratnakar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission

¶17

to withdraw this application with respect to petitioner no. 1, namely, Bhogendra Paswan.

¶18

Permission is accorded.

¶19

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as

¶20

withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 1.

¶21

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Arer P.S. Case No. 148 of 2023, F.I.R. dated

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24401 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 2/4

¶23

06.10.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 376, 341, 323, 504, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

According to prosecution case, one co-accussed, namely, Sunil Paswan allured the daughter of the informant and took her to Darbhanga where on the pretext of marriage he committed rape with her. It is further alleged that Sunil Paswan brought victim in his house and this petitioner being the grandmother of the co-accused along with other accused persons have ousted the victim from their house.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis that the petitioner is the grandmother of the co-accused, namely, Sunil Paswan. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against the petitioner rather the allegation against this petitioner is that when the family members of the informant came inside the house of the petitioner, then the petitioner along with other coaccused have abused them.

¶26

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24401 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 3/4

¶28

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and apart from that the petitioner is the grandmother of the co-accused, namely, Sunil Paswan, let the petitioner no. 2, namely, Buchani Devi, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti in connection with Arer P.S. Case No. 148 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

¶29

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶30

ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24401 of 2024(2) dt.06-05-2024 4/4

¶32

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶33

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶34

Vanisha/-

¶35

U T

Bhogendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhogendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharwan Ray @ Shrawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Anmol Singh @ Anmol Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Yadav @ Adarsh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramdev Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar