Petition under inherent powers seeking quashing of cognizance order passed under Sections 30(a)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Counsel for petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application; permission was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25949 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Jamui
======================================================
Vijay Saw @ Vijay Kumar Saw @ Vijay Panchu Sah, aged about 44 years, Male, Son Of Panchi Sah, Resident of Village- Latta, P.S.- Laxmipur, DistrictJamui.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : M/S. Sunil Kumar Pathak and Pramod Kumar, Advocates For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 10-12-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25949 of 2023(4) dt.10-12-2024 2/2
on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
U.K./- U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Saw @ Vijay Kumar Saw @ Vijay Panchu Sah
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
