lodged by the petitioner under sections 341, 323, 447, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. A copy of the same is Annexure-2 to the petition. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the manner of occurrence is other than what has been narrated in the complaint petition and is correctly described in the FIR (Annexure-2) lodged by the petitioner. Referring to the contents of the letter dated 6.9.2023 written by the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Sadar, Biharsharif, Nalanda to the Superintendent of Police, Naland (Annexure R/2 to the counter affidavit of opposite party no.2), learned counsel submits that the allegations in the FIR registered by the petitioner were found to be true and on conclusion of the investigation, chargesheet was submitted against three accused persons including Rajendra Prasad and Rajiv Kumar, both of whom have been named as witness in the instant complaint filed against the petitioner. It is further submitted that so far as the complaint is concerned, there is no reasonable explanation for the delay, no medical report has been brought on record, even therein the occurrence is of 8.1.2023 and the place of occurrence is the house of the petitioner. The registration of the earlier FIR has been suppressed in the complaint. It is submitted that on the face of it the same has been filed by the complainant only to set
