Hon'ble Justice Sandeep Kumar allowed the application for quashing of FIR registered u/s 376 IPC. On admission that parties have settled the case, the prosecution against the petitioner was quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25333 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
Anil Yadav@ Anil Kumar Son Of Sanjay @ Kumar@ Sanjay Yadav Resident Of Village- Matiyara, Uparhar Sigraur, Lalgopalganj, Ps- Nababganj, DisttPrayagraj Up
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned APP and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, Sri Satish Chandra.
2. This application has been filed for quashing the F.I.R. of Mahila P.S. Case No. 21 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 376 of the IPC.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Guddu/- U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Section 376 IPC is liable to be quashed in light of settlement between parties.
Whether the application for quashing the FIR is maintainable and should be allowed given the settlement.
Anil Yadav
Ruchi Kumari
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
