The petitioner sought bail in a case registered for offences under Sections 324, 326, 307, 302, and 498A IPC. The court, noting the serious allegations and custody status, dismissed the bail application and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49604 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2022 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur
======================================================
Lalit Kumar Mahto @ Lalit Kumar Son of Late Rajendra Mahto @ Abadha Mahto Resident of Vill.- Korbaddha, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raja Ram Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 24-07-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49604 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2
against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to
the petitioner.
of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner facing serious charges of murder and dowry cruelty?
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalit Kumar Mahto
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
