Allowed

Ranjeet Pathak @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Apr 2024CR. MISC./24930/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners apprehending arrest in Sessions Case No.1388 of 2023 involving alleged cheating and property dispute under IPC Sections 420, 504, 506. The Petitioners were directed to refund the alleged consideration money in installments to the Nazarat of Civil Court at Motihari as a condition for bail. The bail bond could be cancelled if directions are not

What did the court decide?

Petitioners are enlarged on bail on surrender to lower court within 6 weeks, securing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to ordering refund of Rs. 10 lakhs in installments to Nazarat, Motih

Ranjeet Pathak @ Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24930 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1388 Year-2023 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANJEET PATHAK @ RANJEET KUMAR SON OF MAHENDRA KISHORE PATHAK R/O-KESARIYA PATHAK PATTI WARD NO. 8, P.S.KESARIYA, DISTT.-EAST CHAMPARAN

¶5

SMT. NEHA KUMARI @ NEHA KUMARI WIFE OF RANJEET KUMAR R/O-KESARIYA PATHAK PATTI WARD NO. 8, P.S.-KESARIYA, DISTT.-EAST CHAMPARAN

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

ASHOK KUMAR SON OF LATE KASHI PRASAD R/O-KESARIYA, WARD NO. 8, P.S.-KESARIYA, DISTT.-EAST CHAMPARAN

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subodh Kumar Barnwal , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP For the OP 2 : Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate Namita Sharma @Namita Kumari , Advocate

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 24-04-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

¶17

It is alleged that these petitioners did not execute

¶18

the sale deed in favour of the complainant even after taking the

¶19

consideration money in advance .

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24930 of 2024(2) dt.24-04-2024 2/3

¶21

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to pay the alleged amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- ( 10 lakhs ) in installments to the Opposite Party No. 2.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid contention made on behalf of the petitioner, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of JM 1^st Class Motihari , in complaint Case No. 1388 of 2023 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with direction to the petitioner that :-

¶23

(i) Petitioner shall refund Rs. 5,00,000/- ( five lacs) through Bank Draft/cash in the Nazarat of Civil Court, Motihari at the time of furnishing bailbond.

¶24

(ii) The petitioner shall refund the rest amount i.e., Rs. 5,00,000/- ( five lacs) in two equal installments of Rs. 2,50,000 /- (two lacs fifty thousand) through Bank Draft/cash in the Nazarat of Civil Court, Motihari within a period of two month from the date of furnishing bail-bond. (iii) The aforesaid payment shall be subject to the final outcome of the case .

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24930 of 2024(2) dt.24-04-2024 3/3

¶26

(iv) If petitioner does not abide by the aforesaid directions, the learned Court below is at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner.

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

Koushik/-

¶29

U T

Ranjeet Pathak @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Pathak @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar, through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Angesh Kumar @ Angesh Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Kedar Nath Tiwary @ Mukesh Tiwary @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar