Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case alleging he received Rs. 9.40 lakhs for supplying articles but neither supplied them nor returned the money. Considering the nature and gravity of the allegations, the High Court rejected the bail prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24655 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-798 Year-2023 Thana- PATLIPUTRA District- Patna
======================================================
Kedar Nath Tiwary @ Mukesh Tiwary @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Kedar Nath Tiwary R/o East Ram Krishna Nagar, Opp. shiv Gangotri Bhawan, P.S. - Ram Krishna Nagar, Distt. - Patna ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, Addl Public Prosecutor ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24655 of 2024(2) dt.24-04-2024 2/2
prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner apprehending arrest in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case should be granted anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kedar Nath Tiwary @ Mukesh Tiwary @ Mukesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
