Purshottam Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court considered an anticipatory bail petition regarding an FIR involving assault. While bail for Petitioner No. 2 was granted due to simple injury, bail for Petitioner No. 1 was rejected due to causing grievous injury.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21536 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2023 Thana- ANTI District- Gaya
======================================================
- Purshottam Kumar son of Late Krishna Yadav Resident of Village- Mayapur, P.S. Fatehpur, District- Gaya
- Kaulej Yadav son of Late Teni Yadav Resident of Village- Mayapur, P.S. Fatehpur, District- Gaya
- ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
======================================================
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in an IPC case involving assault and grievous injury.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Purshottam Kumar
- petitioner
Kaulej Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court