Allowed¶22

Senti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2024CR. MISC./21304/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; theft; Sections 457 & 380 IPC; Khagaria (C N) P.S. Case No.981 of 2023; named accused in FIR; no eyewitness claim; naming on suspicion; custody since 24.09.2023; one criminal antecedent, on bail therein; bail bonds Rs.30,000 with two like sureties; conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.; CJM Khagaria; Patna High Court; Dr. Anshuman, J.; order dated 02-04-2024.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in Khagaria (C N) P.S. Case No.981 of 2023, subject to conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. ¶22

Senti Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21304 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-981 Year-2023 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Senti Kumar Son of Ramu Singh Resident of vill.-Sanhouli, P.S.-Khagaria, Distt.-Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 02-04-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khagaria (C N) P.S. Case No.981 of 2023 lodged under Sections 457 and 380 of the I.P.C.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against three named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation that they have committed theft at the house of the informant.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that from the content of F.I.R., it transpires that there is no eye witness and as per the disclosure of the informant, it is clear that villagers have disclosed the name of the petitioner and due to

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21304 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/2

¶18

this reason, the informant has disclosed the name of the petitioner only on the basis of suspicion.

¶19

Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2023 having one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer

¶21

for bail.

¶22

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/(Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Khagaria (C N) P.S. Case No.981 of 2023, subject to the following conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶24

Prakashmani/-

¶25

U T

Senti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Senti Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogeshwar Singh and Ors. Vs B.D.O,Biraul and Ors.

Jitendra Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramadhar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suchit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar @ Sanny Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar