Raja Sahani @ Munna Maikal Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21022 of 2024

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2022 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga

======================================================

Raja Sahani @ Munna Maikal Son of Mahesh Sahani R/o Village- Lohiya Nagar, Ward No. 28, P.S.- Lohiya Nagar Muffsil, District- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 26-07-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶13

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

2. The accused/petitioner seeks bail in connection

¶15

with Biraul P.S. Case No. 122 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395, 397, 412/120-B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

3. The accused/petitioner is not named in the FIR and is in custody since 08.11.2023.

¶17

4. Allegation against the petitioner is to commit dacoity in Punjab National Bank, Supaul Bazar Branch, District – Darbhanga on 07.04.2022 and while committing so taken away cash worth Rs. 41,79,457/-(Rupees Forty

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21022 of 2024(4) dt.26-07-2024 2/3

¶19

One Lakh Seventy Nine Thousand and Four Hundred Fifty Seven).

¶20

5. It is submitted that the name of petitioner surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused Md. Rahmat, Khurshid Alam and Aslam Azad, where in furtherance of their confessional statements nothing incriminating/recovered during the course of investigation as to connect petitioner prima-facie with the present occurrence of bank dacoity. It is pointed out that no T.I.P. was conducted till date. While concluding argument, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in ten more criminal cases where he is on bail in all cases and in maximum of the cases his name surfaced on the basis of confessional statement, as of the present case, having otherwise no evidentiary value and moreover investigation of this case has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶21

6. Learned APP opposes the prayer for grant of bail

¶22

to the petitioner.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21022 of 2024(4) dt.26-07-2024 3/3

¶24

7. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances,

¶25

and by taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arises out of confessional statement of co-accused persons namely, Md. Rahmat, Khurshid Alam and Aslam Azad nothing surfaced against the petitioner as to connect him prima-facie with the present occurrence of bank dacoity, coupled with the fact that investigation has already completed, where petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2023, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Biraul Darbhanga in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 122 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶26

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶27

S.Tripathi/- U T

Raja Sahani @ Munna Maikal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Sahani @ Munna Maikal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shahid Hussain @ Mister Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanwati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Kishori Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Himanshu @ Himanshu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mangan @ Md. Magan @ Ma. Magan Vs The State of Bihar