Appeal against a cognizance order in a SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case was withdrawn by the appellants; the court permitted withdrawal with liberty to raise all issues before the trial court and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1462 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2017 Thana- MORO District- Darbhanga
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Zeyaul Hoda, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
9 25-07-2024
appearing on behalf of appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal, which preferred for quashing the cognizance order, which is under SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 with liberty to raise all such issues at
appropriate stage before learned Trial Court.
2. Request allowed.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1462 of 2019(9) dt.25-07-2024 2/2
dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
S.Tripathi/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahid Hussain @ Mister
Md. Sajid Hussain @ Pyare
Md. Khalid Hussan @ Gore
Hamid Hussain
Abdul Moghis @ Shad Anjum
Md. Zank Anjum @ Zank Anjum @ Jauk Anjum
Chandra Shekhar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
