The petitioner sought to withdraw a quashing application. The Court permitted withdrawal with liberty to raise arguments before the trial court, resulting in dismissal of the application.
Permission granted to withdraw application with liberty to raise points before the learned court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20751 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2009 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai
======================================================
LAL BAHADUR MAHTO SON OF LATE GOPI MAHTO R/O VILLAGEPIPARIYA, P.S PIPARIYA AND DIST- LAKHISARAI
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-
U T
Lal Bahadur Mahto
State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Jha
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
