Allowed

Sanju Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2024CR. MISC./11609/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by a petitioner apprehending arrest in a cheating and forgery case over transfer of land by forged registered deeds. The court noted the dispute appeared essentially civil in nature and granted anticipatory bail with conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Sanju Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11609 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2023 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanju Mishra Wife of Jitendra Mishra Resident of Village- Jamune, Police Station- Chandauti, District- Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aryan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 22-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

It is alleged that on the basis of forged registered deed, the husband of petitioner transferred 78.13 decimal land at Village – Churi and 64.5 decimal alongwith the building situated at Village – Bahadur Bigha in favour of his elder brother Brijraj Mishra and his own wife as well as in favour of his nephew Rakesh Mishra on 11.01.2023.

¶11

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that accused persons are own Gotiya of the informant and informant’s own sister was holding the power of Attorney from Smt. Meera Mishra and was directed by informant’s sister to sell the property. At best, it is a case of the civil dispute. Petitioner has got no concern with the said transaction and she has got clean antecedent.

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11609 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2

¶13

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer

¶14

for anticipatory bail.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 60 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶17

anay/-

¶18

U T

Sanju Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanju Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Himanchal Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Umrawati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Triloki Nath Singh Vs The State through C.B.I.

Jitendra Sahni @ Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanjee Yadav Vs The State of Bihar