Partly allowed

Uriya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2024CR. MISC./20606/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought modification of an anticipatory bail order to correct her husband's name from 'Dukhan Paswan' to 'Madan Ram'. The court allowed the correction but declined to extend the time for surrender as the application was filed after the time had expired.

What did the court decide?

Modification of the order dated 21.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 27345 of 2023 to correct the name of the petitioner's husband. Application partly allowed; time for surrender not extended.

Uriya Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20606 of 2024

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27345 of 2023

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2020 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Uriya Devi wife of Madan Ram R/Village - Chandel Marich W. No - 7, PO - Balaut PS - Supaul Dist. - Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 26-04-2024

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of

¶18

the informant.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by an order dated 21.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 27345 of 2023. It is further submitted that while describing the petitioner in the anticipatory bail application it was recorded that she is wife of Dukhan Paswan when she is wife of Madam Ram. It is next submitted that the said inadvertence was caused at the end of the office of the learned Advocate.

¶20

Learned counsel further submits that the present modification application thus has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 21.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20606 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 2/2

¶22

27345 of 2023 to the extent that the name of the husband of petitioner (petitioner no. 5 in Cr. Misc. No. 27345 of 2023) be read as ‘Madan Ram’ instead of ‘Dukhan Paswan’.

¶23

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant do not oppose the modification application.

¶24

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner Uriya Devi (petitioner no. 5 in Cr. Misc. No. 27345 of 2023) is described as Uriya Devi, wife of Madan Ram, Resident of Village - Chandel Marich Ward No - 7, PO - Balaut PS - Supaul Dist. - Supaul.

¶25

The order dated 21.07.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 27345 of 2023 is modified to the extent indicated above with respect to petitioner no. 5 i.e. Uriya Devi but since the petitioner no. 5 filed the present modification application after the time of surrender was over as such the Court is not inclined to extend the time of surrender.

¶26

Hence, the modification application is partly

¶27

allowed.

¶28

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶29

Kundan/-

¶30

U T

Uriya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uriya Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Gorakh Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Halo Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Chitra Rani Chatterjee Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar