Allowed

Biteshwar Verma @ Birendra Verma @ Birendra Kumar Verma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Apr 2024CR. MISC./19876/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fourth regular bail application by the main assailant in a 2018 murder case; trial stalled at prosecution evidence stage with no witnesses produced despite prior directions. Considering five years' custody and slow trial progress, the court admitted the petitioner to regular bail with conditions to appear on every trial date.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on regular bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount before Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur, subject to appearing on each trial date.

Biteshwar Verma @ Birendra Verma @ Birendra Kumar Verma Vs The… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19876 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1102 Year-2018 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Biteshwar Verma @ Birendra Verma @ Birendra Kumar Verma S/O Late Sahja Verma @ Satya Narayan Verma Resident of Village- Bhagwaitpur, P.S.Bihta (Neora), District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

7 26-04-2024 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

The present petition is by way of fourth attempt at the behest of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Bihta PS case no. 1102 of 2018, registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶14

The petitioner is the main assailant of Bihta PS case no. 1102 of 2018, as such, earlier on three occasions, the bail applications of the petitioner have been rejected.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while rejecting the bail application of the petitioner for the first time on 02.09.2019 in Cr. Misc. no. 34692 of 2019, liberty was

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19876 of 2023(7) dt.26-04-2024 2/3

¶17

granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within nine months. He further submits that again, the petitioner moved bail application for the second time vide Cr. Misc. no. 31249 of 2020 but the same was also rejected by order dated 05.02.2021, with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if the trial is not concluded within nine months but even then, the trial was not concluded and then the petitioner moved his bail application for the third time vide Cr. Misc. no. 68652 of 2021, which was rejected by order dated 03.08.2022, with a direction to the District Magistrate and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna to ensure production of the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court, so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period of six months. The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 27.10.2018 i.e. for more than 05 years.

¶18

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court had called for a report regarding the stage of trial vide order dated 30.01.2024, pursuant to which, a report dated 04.03.2024 has been submitted by learned A.S.J.-III, Civil Court, Danapur, stating therein that Sessions Trial No. 135 of 2021 is pending at the stage of prosecution evidence and up till now, the prosecution has not produced any witness.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19876 of 2023(7) dt.26-04-2024 3/3

¶20

Regards being had to the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the period of custody of the petitioner and slow progress of trial, I deem it fit and appropriate to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioner is directed to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court of Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur in connection with Bihta PS case no. 1102 of 2018.

¶22

It is further directed that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date so fixed by the Court and in default of two consecutive appearances, the present privilege of regular bail shall liable to be cancelled.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

rinkee/-

¶25

U T

Biteshwar Verma @ Birendra Verma @ Birendra Kumar Verma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Biteshwar Verma @ Birendra Verma @ Birendra Kumar Verma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Chandra Paswan and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Sachidanand Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Harihar Prasad @ Harihar Prasad Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Sah @ Krishna Prasad Sah @ Krishna Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs Saneeta Kumari Alias Guriya