Allowed¶5

Anil Kumar @ Gorakh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Mar 2024CR. MISC./19517/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19517 of 2024 (order dt. 21-03-2024), arising from Daud Nagar Excise P.S. Case No.188/2023, Aurangabad; anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 30(a), 32(3), Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018; allegation of recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle; custodial confession of Arvind Kumar; bail bond Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions; Justice Satyavrat Verma; petitioner Anil Kumar @ Gorakh versus The State of Bihar.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, upon arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ¶5

Anil Kumar @ Gorakh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19517 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2023 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Kumar @ Gorakh Son of Virodhi Paswan Resident of VillageMahadeva, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-03-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32(3) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he is not the owner of the motorcycle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Arvind Kumar in police custody, which does not have any evidentiary value.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19517 of 2024(2) dt.21-03-2024 2/2

¶18

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Daud Nagar Excise P.S. Case No.188/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

amit/-

¶22

U T

Anil Kumar @ Gorakh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar @ Gorakh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabina Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Lavkush Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Intekhab Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Pir Mohammad Vs the State of Bihar

Ravi Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar