Allowed

Md. Intekhab Ali v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Mar 2024CR. MISC./18332/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 438 CrPC arising from PS Case 56/2023 at Darauli, the court allowed the petitioner, an accused in an excise violation case, to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond and attending court within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 500/- with two sureties, subject to appearing before the Court within six weeks.

Md. Intekhab Ali Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18332 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2023 Thana- DURAULI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Intekhab Ali S/o Nur Alam Khan @ Noor Alam Khan R/o VILLAGE - HARPUR MADANPUR, P.S. ANDAR, DISTRICT - SIWAN

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Meena Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-03-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

¶15

arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 360 liters of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle.

¶17

It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the Scorpio vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18332 of 2024(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2

¶19

hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his driver would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

¶20

The learned APP for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶21

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Excise Court No.1, Siwan in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No.56 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Prakash Narayan U T

Md. Intekhab Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Intekhab Ali v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Kumar Singh @ Binod Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Yadav @ Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Lal Bachhan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Govind Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ramchandra Hansda Vs The State of Bihar