The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a theft case involving the pilferage of railway bridge iron-rods, setting a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and imposing standard conditions.
Bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of like amount each to the CJM Rohtas upon arrest or surrender.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18390 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2023 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas
======================================================
Ravi Prakash Son of Ram Chela Singh, Resident of village + P.O.- Ahraon, P.S.- Sasaram(Muffasil), Distt.-Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-04-2024 Heard Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, the learned
counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Narsingh Tanti, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18390 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 2/4
conspiracy.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18390 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 3/4
period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas, where the case is pending in connection with Sasaram (Mufassil) PS Case No. 251 of 2023 , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:
(i). Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the trial Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the trial Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the trial Court.
(ii). If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iii). And further condition that the trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the trial Court shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18390 of 2024(2) dt.02-04-2024 4/4
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Shahnawaz/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a theft case under Section 379 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Prakash
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
