The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking recruitment as SAFAI KARAMCHARI. The Court held that since the selection process had been cancelled and the cancellation order was not challenged, no case was made out for interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6343 of 2012
======================================================
LALAN KUMAR S/O Sri Shyam Narayan Paswan R/O Moh-Chitkohra Nahar Par (Ambedkar Chowk), P.O.-Anisabad, P.S.-Gardanibagh, Town And District-Patna, Presently Residing In The House Of Late Yogendra Paswan, Mohalla-Mithanpura, P.O.-Ramna, Pani Tank Chowk, P.S.-Mithanpura, Town And District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajiv Nayan Singh, Advocate : Mr. Murlidhar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent Bank: Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr.Advocate : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Advocate : Ms.Mina Kumari, Advocate : Ms. Dilkash Khan, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 01-04-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents-Bank.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6343 of 2012 dt.01-04-2024 2/3
KARAMCHARI’-cum-Sub-Staff in any Branch, Central Bank of India in terms of letter dated 11.11.2011 (Annexure-1) of the writ application.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6343 of 2012 dt.01-04-2024 3/3
the learned Single Judge was challenged in LPA No.449 of 2016 which was allowed in favour of the Bank vide order dated 29.11.2016 by which the LPA Court has set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and finally the matter was travelled to the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide SLP (c) No.(s)22164 of 2017 and the Hon’ble Supreme Court was pleased to dismiss the SLP (c) No. (s)22164 of 2017 vide order dated 06.02.2019 holding that no case is made out for interference. Learned counsel for the Bank further submits that in view of the aforesaid, no case is made out for interference in the present matter and apart from that the petitioner has not challenged the cancellation order for process of selection and he has come before this Court for direction upon the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner in terms of Annexures-1 and 7.
| Nitesh/- | (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) | |
|---|---|---|
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR | |
| CAV DATE | NA | |
| Uploading Date | 05.04.2024 | |
| Transmission Date | NA |
Nitesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Bank's cancellation of the selection process for SAFAI KARAMCHARI post warrants judicial interference.
Lalan Kumar
The Central Bank of India
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
