One-judge oral order allowing withdrawal of an anticipatory bail application as allegedly infructuous due to the petitioner's subsequent arrest, dismissing the application accordingly. No substantive legal reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18353 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- DHANGAI District- Bhojpur
======================================================
MRITUNJAY SINGH SON OF RAM SAKAL SINGH R/O-KHAIRHAN, P.S.-DHANGAIN DISTT.-BHOJPUR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kumar Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 26-07-2024 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail
filed on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023 registered for the offences under Section 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
2 . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been arrested in the case and, hence, he seeks permission to withdraw this application as having become infructuous.
3 . Permission is accorded.
4 . Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Mritunjay Singh
State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
