Allowed

Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Aug 2024CR. MISC./18079/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with a police FIR, requiring a monthly maintenance payment to the wife and security, subject to specific conditions regarding deposit and account verification.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted subject to furnishing bail bond, undertaking maintenance of Rs. 3,000/month to wife for six weeks from arrest/surrender, and adhering to specific conditions regarding

Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Sharma Vs… — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18079 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2023 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Kamleshwar Sharma R/o vill - Barauni 03, P.s. - Teghra, Distt. - Begusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kanchan Kumari W/o Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar R/o vill - Barauni, P.S. - Teghra, Distt. - Begusarai and D/o Kanhaiya Sharma, Presently residing at vill - Pipra Dewas, ward no. 9, P.S. - Barauni, Distt. - Begusarai, Pin 851112

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

Earlier, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre,

¶13

3 28-08-2024 Earlier, the matter was referred to Mediation Centre, but the dispute between the parties could not be settled through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (report at flag ‘M’).

¶14

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 276 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the Opposite party

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18079 of 2024(3) dt.28-08-2024 2/3

¶18

no. 2. The petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,000/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite party no. 2.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶20

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,000/- (three thousand) per month to the opposite party no. 2, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 276 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C as well as on the following conditions:-

¶21

‘(i) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the Court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶22

(ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the O.P. No. 2.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18079 of 2024(3) dt.28-08-2024 3/3

¶24

(iii) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the Court below would be

¶25

at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶26

(iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.’

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

utkarsh/-

¶29

U T

Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Sharma @ Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deva @ Deba @ Deoraj Sah @ Deoraj Kumar @ Deoraj Kr. @ Deoraj Vs The State of Bihar

Upendra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Birju Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Babu Singh @ Rajababu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mohammad Khurshid @ Mohammad Khurshid Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahid Vs The State of Bihar