Allowed

Upendra Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2024CR. APP (SJ)/2308/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal against rejection of anticipatory bail in a case alleging job-fraud cheating, sexual exploitation and caste-based abuse. The High Court found no specific allegation against the appellants, set aside the lower court's order and granted anticipatory bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned bail-rejection order dated 21.03.2024 set aside; appellants to be released on anticipatory bail on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties each within six weeks.

Upendra Paswan Vs the State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2308 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Upendra Paswan Son Of Devnarayan Paswan Resident Of Village - Khakharua, P.S. - Bakhri, District - Begusarai

¶5

Palan Paswan @ Palan Son Of Mahesh Paswan Resident Of Village - Khakharua, P.S. - Bakhri, District - Begusarai

¶6

Rakesh Kumar Son Of Upendra Paswan Resident Of Village - Khakharua, P.S. - Bakhri, District - Begusarai

¶7

Satish Kumar @ Chhatish Paswan Son Of Upendra Paswan Resident Of Village - Khakharua, P.S. - Bakhri, District - Begusarai

¶8

... ... Appellant/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State Of Bihar

¶11

Kavita Devi Wife Of Virendra Paswan Resident Of Village And Post - Ejani, P.S. - Chhourahi, District - Begusarai

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Usha Kumari 1, Spl.P.P. Mr. Vinod Gautam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 27-08-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Special P.P. for of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2.

¶16

This appeal has been filed against the order dated 21.03.2024 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Begusarai in connection with A.B.P. No. 548 of 2024, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 29 of 2023, registered under Sections 420, 406, 341, 323, 376, 504, 506/34 of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2308 of 2024(2) dt.27-08-2024 2/3

¶18

Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short “SC/ST Act”), whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of appellants has been rejected.

¶19

As per prosecution case, on 10.01.2020, co-accused Chandra Shekhar Paswan, in lieu of providing job in police department, took total Rs. Ten lacs from the husband of informant and on 28.12.2022, co-accused Chandra Shekhar Paswan took informant to Patna and established physical relation with her and when informant came to the house of coaccused Chandra Shekhar, all the accused persons including these appellants abused her with caste name and committed Maarpeet with her. It is further alleged that co-accused Dilip Rai also forcibly established physical relation with informant.

¶20

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that from bare perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that specific accusation of taking money and establishing physical relation is against coaccused Chandra Shekhar Paswan. So far as these appellants are concerned, they have been made accused merely because they are close relatives of co-accused Chandra Shekhar and there is no specific allegation of abuse and assault against them. It is not the case of the informant that any member of the public was

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2308 of 2024(2) dt.27-08-2024 3/3

¶22

present at the time of occurrence and as such, no offence under the SC/ST Act is made out against appellants. Appellants claim clean antecedent.

¶23

Learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the appeal

¶24

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the rival submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the impugned order dated 21.03.2024 is set aside. The criminal appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

¶25

Let the appellants, as named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Begusarai in connection with A.B.P. No. 548 of 2024, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 29 of 2023.

¶26

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶27

anay

¶28

U T

Upendra Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurudev Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar Yadav @ Dilkhush Kumar @ Dilkhush Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sivanand Sardar @ Sivanand Sarkar Vs The State of Bihar

Deva @ Deba @ Deoraj Sah @ Deoraj Kumar @ Deoraj Kr. @ Deoraj Vs The State of Bihar

Birju Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Devnarayan Sahni Vs The State of Bihar