Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an Araria firing-injury case, citing FIR delay, private hospital treatment and a compromise with the informant. The State noted the delay but urged surrender and regular bail. The petitioner withdrew the application and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18028 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2023 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
PINTU PASWAN @ PINTU KUMAR PASWAN Son of Hiralal Paswan Resident of Village-Jimarahi ward No. 2, P.S.-Narpatganj (Bathnaha), District-Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 05-04-2024
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18028 of 2024(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2
delay in instituting the F.I.R. and the injury report is not of a government hospital but then allegation is of firing causing injury but then the learned APP further submits that if the parties have compromised in that event the petitioner should go and surrender and seek regular bail.
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Should anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner facing allegations of firing causing firearm injury in a relative dispute, given FIR delay and compromise between parties?
Pintu Paswan @ Pintu Kumar Paswan
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
