Allowed¶22

Vivek Lami Chhami v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 May 2024CR. MISC./16316/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No. 16316 of 2024, decided 16-05-2024 by Chandra Prakash Singh, J. Bail application under NDPS Act Sections 20, 22, 24 arising from Raxaul PS Case No. 106 of 2017 (East Champaran); alleged recovery of 5.700 kg charas-like substance; custody since 15.04.2017; bail allowed with Rs. 20,000 bail bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, East Champaran, in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 106 of 2017. ¶22

Vivek Lami Chhami Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16316 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2017 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vivek Lami Chhami S/O Late Sagar Lami Chhami R/O Village- Virta Chowk, P.S- Chimani Park, Distt.- Parsa (nepal)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 16-05-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 106 of 2017 dated 14.04.2017 registered for the offences punishable u/s 20, 22 and 24 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 5.700 kg of Charas like substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case merely on the basis of the suspicion. No incriminating article

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16316 of 2024(3) dt.16-05-2024 2/2

¶19

has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.04.2017.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 106 of 2017.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

Jyoti/-

¶25

U T

Vivek Lami Chhami v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Lami Chhami v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar @ Chhotu Singh @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Mishra @ Dilip Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nishant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Afatab Alam @ Afatab Mian Vs The State of Bihar