Allowed

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 May 2024CR. MISC./16078/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case registered under Section 366A IPC alleging kidnapping of a minor. The court noted the claim of consensual marriage and the period spent in custody. The bail application was allowed, and the petitioner was directed to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16078 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pintu Kumar Son of Naresh Prasad Chandrawanshi R/o Village- Pahsi lane, New Godown, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Patel, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 15-05-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

A.P.P for the State.

¶16

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021 dated 20.04.2021 registered for the offences punishable u/s 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

3 . As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant on the pretext of marriage.

¶18

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is love affair between the petitioner and the victim. The victim was not forced to have illicit intercourse with

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16078 of 2024(4) dt.15-05-2024 2/2

¶20

another person. The victim in her statement recored u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she went with the petitioner of her own will and wanted to marry him. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2023.

¶21

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶22

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 189 of 2021.

¶23

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

guddukr/-

¶26

U T

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pintu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surya Mani Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Navin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Aman @ Amit Kumar Rishideo Vs the State of Bihar

Premchand Kumar @ Premchandra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Rai @ Rakesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar