Harivansh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Feb 2024CR. MISC./13567/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Patna High Court CRL.MISC. No.13567 of 2024; dated 28-02-2024; Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; Vijaipur/Vijayepur PS Case No. 371 of 2023; District Gopalganj; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; liquor recovery 77.940 litres from car; petitioners Harivansh Ram and Rakesh Kumar apprehended on spot; charge-sheet submitted; custody since 25.12.2023; no criminal antecedent; alleged non-compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Release of both petitioners on bail in Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2023 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court. ¶¶20

Harivansh Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13567 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-371 Year-2023 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harivansh Ram son of Sonelal Ram Village- Bhav Chapra P.S.- Minapur Dist- Muzaffarpur

¶5

Rakesh Kumar son of Gagandev Rai Village- Bhav chapra P.S.- Minapur Dist- Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rishi Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 28-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2023, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that, 77.940 liters liquor was recovered from one car and both the petitioners were apprehended on spot.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13567 of 2024(2) dt.28-02-2024 2/2

¶18

the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 1 is owner of the car and petitioner no. 2 was sitting in the car. The petitioners are in custody since 25.12.2023 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 371 of 2023.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Rajorshi/-

¶24

U T

Harivansh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harivansh Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anshu Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Kari Yadav @ Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Kant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satrughan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shanti Devi Kunwar Vs The State of Bihar