Allowed¶22

Anshu Kumar @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Feb 2024CR. MISC./12856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; CR. MISC. No.12856 of 2024; Patna High Court; Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; order dated 27-02-2024; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Sections 30(a) and 32(iii); Excise P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024, Begusarai; 144 liters liquor recovered from vehicle; alleged non-compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.; custody since 19.01.2024; seven criminal antecedents; bail bonds Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024. ¶22

Anshu Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12856 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anshu Kumar @ Golu Son of Kari Singh @ Mukesh Singh Resident of village- Madhurapur Bichla Tola, Ward No. 27, P.S.- Teghra, DistrictBegusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Namita Sharma, Advocate Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 27-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in Excise P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32(iii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that, 144 liters liquor was recovered from vehicle.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12856 of 2024(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2

¶18

the petitioner is neither driver nor owner of the seized vehicle. The petitioner is in custody since 19.01.2024 and has got seven criminal antecedents in which the petitioner is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

¶20

the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 27 of 2024.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Rajorshi/-

¶25

U T

Anshu Kumar @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu Kumar @ Golu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pintu Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Kari Yadav @ Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Kant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Yadav Vs the State of Bihar