Dismissed¶26

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2024CR. MISC./13478/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.13478 of 2024; Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar; anticipatory bail refused; Khusrupur P.S. Case No.330 of 2022; Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act; FIR against 20 named accused; petitioner and Anmol Kumar alleged firearm assault on informant's cousin, right leg injury; clean antecedent claim; APP opposed prayer; informant's counsel noted one co-accused bailed without overt-act allegation; regular bail to be considered on surrender without prejudice; Dr. Anshuman, J.; decided 08-05-2024.

What did the court decide?

However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. ¶26

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13478 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2022 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjan Kumar Son of Tulla Singh @ Tula Singh Resident of Village- Lodipur Mansurpur, P.S.- Khushrupur, District- Patna (Bihar)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 08-05-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶16

counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶17

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No.330 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶18

As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against 20 named accused persons including the present petitioner. In the FIR, allegation against the present petitioner and one Anmol Kumar is that they have assaulted by fire-arm on the cousin of the informant, due to which he received injury on his right leg.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13478 of 2024(3) dt.08-05-2024 2/2

¶21

antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Counsel submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence.

¶22

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

¶23

on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶24

Learned counsel for the informant submits that

¶25

only one person has been granted bail against whom there is no allegation of overt-act.

¶26

In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

¶27

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶28

Mkr./-

¶29

U T

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwati Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kashinath Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Sharwan Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Laddu Manjhi @ Laddu Kumar Manjhi @ Abdhesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bajrangi Ram @ Vishal Ram @ Bajrangi @ Vishal King Vs the State of Bihar