Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC7 May 2024CWJC/20645/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC No.20645 of 2018, Patna High Court, Dr. Anshuman, J., order dated 07-05-2024. Eighteen petitioners sought coverage under Rule 8(Kha)(i) of the Bihar State Revenue Services Rules, 2010 pleading higher pay scale/grade at initial appointment; State's preliminary objection that a challenge to the Rules lay before the Division Bench; writ petition disposed of with liberty to challenge the Rules before the appropriate forum; no merits adjudication, no costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to challenge the Bihar State Revenue Services Rules, 2010 before the appropriate forum. ¶¶40

Ashok Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20645 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ashok Kumar Son of Late Indrasan Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Anand Nagar Panchmandira, Siwan, P.S. Siwan Sadar, District- Siwan.

¶4

Binod Ram Son of Sri Sunain Ram, Resident of Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan.

¶5

Brajesh Baitha Son of Raghunath Baitha, Resident of Village- Manjhaulia, P.S.- Guthani, District- Siwan.

¶6

Prem Kumar Manjhi, Son of Late Singhasan Manjhi, Resident of VillageGopalpur, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan.

¶7

Sharma Ram, Son of Late Bithan Ram, Resident of Village- Dharhara, P.S.Mairwa, District- Siwan.

¶8

Dilip Kumar, Son of Dharsan Rai, Resident of Village- Mukundpur, P.S.-, District- Vaishali.

¶9

Rajeev Kumar Gond, Son of Rama Shankar Gond, Resident of Village- Don, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan.

¶10

Parmanand Ram, Son of Nagina Ram, Resident of Village- Chainpur, P.S.Goriya Kothi, District- Siwan.

¶11

Ram Naresh Baitha, Son of Ganesh Baitha, Resident of Village- Merahi, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan.

¶12

Shambhu Saran Akela, Son of Late Gauri Sah, Resident of Village- Jalalpur, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan.

¶13

Sudama Ram, Son of Sri Ram Pati Ram, Resident of Village- Sultanpur, P.S.- Aandar, District- Siwan.

¶14

Shahid Eqbal, Son of Late Mustaqim, Resident of Village- Makdum Sarai, Siwan, P.S.- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.

¶15

Ravi Prakash, Son of Late Arjun Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Hospital Road, Chainpur, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan.

¶16

Sunil Kumar, Son of Sugriva Bhakt, Resident of Village- Punak, P.S.Darauli, District- Siwan.

¶17

Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Shyam Nandan Prasad, Resident of VillageSadarpur, P.S.- Barhariya, District- Siwan.

¶18

Shailendra Chaudhary, Son of Shiv Nath Chaudhury, Resident of VillageKoiri Gawan, P.S.- Barhariya, District- Siwan.

¶19

Sujut Ram, Son of Late Nageshwar Ram, Resident of Village- Bhopatpura, P.S.- Maiwa, District- Siwan.

¶20

Manoj Kumar Prasad, Son of Sukhdev Prasad, Resident of Village- Sajna, P.S.- Mairwa, District- Siwan.

¶21

... ... Petitioner/s

¶22

Versus

¶23

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Main Secretariat, Patna.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.20645 of 2018(2) dt.07-05-2024 2/3

¶25

Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.

¶26

Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna.

¶27

Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna

¶28

District Magistrate, Siwan.

¶29

... ... Respondent/s

¶30

======================================================

¶31

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kishore Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ======================================================

¶32

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶33

2 07-05-2024

¶34

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶35

counsel for the State.

¶36

Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that a Rule, which is Annexure-P/5, namely, Bihar State Revenue Services Rules, 2010 has been framed whose Rule 8(Kha)(i) ought to cover the petitioners also because at the time of initial appointment they were at higher pay scale/grade. The petitioners ought to be covered in the category which have been described under Rule 8(Kha)(i) of the said Rules. Counsel submits that those persons who were not inserted in the said Rule are not entitled to be considered under the said Rules because they were not the members of the Bihar State Revenue Services Rules.

¶37

Learned counsel for the State made preliminary objection and submits that since the petitioners have challenged

¶38

Patna High Court CWJC No.20645 of 2018(2) dt.07-05-2024 3/3

¶39

the provision of Rules. Therefore, they ought to file writ petition before the Hon’ble Division Bench because it is the policy of the Government which has come in the form of Bihar State Revenue Services Rules, 2010 and petitioners can be granted relief only when they may challenge the said Rules.

¶40

In the light of the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners that they may challenge the Bihar State Revenue Services Rules, 2010, before appropriate forum.

¶41

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶42

Mkr./-

¶43

Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandit Anand Jha Shastri Vs The Union of India

Rajesh Prasad @Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Singh @ Paltu Vs the State of Bihar

Bhagwati Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kashinath Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Md. Jawed Ali and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.