Dismissed¶20

Rahul @ Rahul Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2024CR. MISC./13115/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court bail rejection; third-attempt bail petition dismissed (12-07-2024); petitioner Rahul @ Rahul Singh in custody since 01.02.2022; POCSO Case No.33 of 2022 arising out of Natwar P.S. Case No.95 of 2019, Rohtas; offences under Sections 363, 365/34 IPC; victim's Section 164 CrPC statement alleges forcible abduction to Kanpur, vermilion applied, rape; victim found minor per medical report; no change in circumstances; judge Mohit Kumar Shah.

What did the court decide?

The Court found that the victim girl specifically alleged she was forcibly kidnapped, that the petitioner forcibly put vermilion on her forehead and raped her, and that she has been found to be a minor. ¶18

Rahul @ Rahul Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13115 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul @ Rahul Singh Son Of Late Abhimanyu Singh, Resident Of Village - Dewal, Police Station - Gamhar, District - Gazipur, U.P.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 12-07-2024

¶12

The present petition has been filed by way of third attempt, at the behest of the petitioner, in connection with POCSO Case No.33 of 2022, arising out of Natwar P.S. Case No.95 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365/34 of the Indian Penal Code, inasmuch as all the earlier petitions of the petitioner for grant of bail have stood rejected.

¶13

The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by one Anju Devi with the sole objective of solemnizing her marriage with the petitioner, whereafter the petitioner had taken the victim girl to Kanpur and had put vermilion on her forehead as also had

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13115 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 2/3

¶15

forcibly engaged in wrong doings with her.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.02.2022, hence he be granted the privilege of bail.

¶17

Per contra , the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted by referring to the earlier order of this Court dated 12.01.2023 that the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 CrPC before the learned Magistrate depicts that the victim girl was taken forcibly to Kanpur where the petitioner had put vermilion on her and moreover, the medical report shows that the victim girl is a minor.

¶18

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into the materials available on record, this Court finds that the victim girl has specifically alleged that she was forcibly kidnapped and then the petitioner had forcibly put vermilion on her forehead and raped her, apart from the fact that the victim girl has been found to be minor, thus, the complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime is writ large from the records, apart from the fact that there is no change in circumstance so as to warrant reconsideration of the prayer of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13115 of 2024(2) dt.12-07-2024 3/3

¶20

the petitioner for grant of bail, hence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, thus, the present petition stands dismissed.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

kanchan/-

¶23

U T

Rahul @ Rahul Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul @ Rahul Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivkumar Prasad @ Anil Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mohsin Vs The State of Bihar

Satyam Kumar Golu @ Golu Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sundar Sharma @ Shyam Sundar Thakur Vs the State of Bihar

Alok Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar