The High Court allowed an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act, setting aside the bail rejection order. Bail was granted subject to a bond of 10,000 Rupees and two sureties.
Impugned bail order set aside; appellant released on bail with a bond of 10,000 Rupees and two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3660 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai
======================================================
Ram Pukar Mahton @ Ram Pukar Mahto Son of Late Mahendra Mahton R/VVillage- Banauli, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Begusarai
... ... Appellant/S
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Madhumay Madhup, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna,SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
learned counsel for the informant.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3660 of 2024(3) dt.21-09-2024 2/3
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3660 of 2024(3) dt.21-09-2024 3/3
under custody since 14.06.2024.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
priyanka/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act for bail should be allowed when the appellant is of clean antecedent.
Whether the impugned bail rejection order should be set aside to grant bail to the appellant.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Pukar Mahton
The State of Bihar
Gulshan Kumar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
