Appeal for bail against rejection by the Sessions Court in a case of assault causing death, with SC/ST Act charges. Trial ongoing with four of ten prosecution witnesses examined; the High Court held it appropriate that the appellants face trial and rejected the bail appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2329 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2020 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate : Mr. Vikash Ratan Bharti, Advocate : Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Advocate : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
5 24-10-2024
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Spl.
PP as also the respondent no.2.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2329 of 2024(5) dt.24-10-2024 2/2
report regarding the stage of the trial and as per it, four out of ten prosecution witnesses have been examined till the letter dated 07.08.2024 was issued.
is on, it will be appropriate that the appellant faces trial.
present.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Should the appellants be granted bail in a pending trial for offences under sections 302, 34 IPC and the SC/ST (POA) Act?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sitaram Mishra
Rajesh Mishra @ Chhotu Mishra
The State of Bihar
Chandani Devi
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
