Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition after learning the underlying trial had concluded during pendency; the court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54991 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2020 Thana- MADHEPUR District- Madhubani
======================================================
Pankaj Kumar Mahto Son of Late Sukhi Pasi Resident of Village - Madhepur, P.S.- Madhepur, District - Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
3 23-10-2024
It has been informed by Mr. Jitendra Bharti, learned
counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the petition, the trial court has concluded the trial. As such, he wants withdrawal of the petition.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
perwez
U T
Pankaj Kumar Mahto Son of Late Sukhi Pasi
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
