Pandey. Sukdeo Pandey died leaving behind three sons, namely, Rajkishore Pandey, Ramvidya Pandey and Ramakant Pandey, whereas Sahdeo Pandey died leaving behind his only son, namely, Ashok Kumar Pandey (plaintiff). It is further contended that plaintiff’s father was illiterate and simple person, and taking advantage of his simplicity, his brothers Sukdeo Pandey and his sons were mismanaging the entire joint family property and hence the father of the plaintiff had filed a suit for partition bearing Partition Suit No. 44 of 1975 against his brother Sukdeo Pandey and his sons along with other purchasers. It is further contended that the plaintiff, who was minor at that time, was also impleaded as plaintiff no. 2 under the guardianship of his father. Further case of the plaintiff is that at that time, he was minor and his father had no knowledge about the entire joint family property and therefore, entire joint family property was not mentioned in the plaint. After attaining the majority, plaintiff remained outside the country and Partition Suit no. 44 of 1975 filed by the plaintiff was decreed with regard to half share in the joint family property. It is further contended that during final proceedings, the defendants in connivance with the pleader commissioner and several sale deeds executed in favour of the father of the defendants got allotted several plots in their favour
