Shiv Ratan Yadav v. Bishwanath Mahto
Case brief
What is this about?
A Letters Patent Appeal was permitted to be withdrawn by the appellant's counsel on instructions and was rejected as withdrawn, with the question of maintainability expressly left unanswered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No. 592 of 2019
======================================================
Shiv Ratan Yadav Son of late Chhedhari Yadav Resident of VillageMangalpur Kala, P.S. Nautan, District- West Champaran.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
- Bishwanath Mahto Son of Late Khedan Mahto Resident of Villagemangalpur kala, P.S. Nautan, District- West Champaran.
- Ratan Yadav Son of late Japat Yadav Resident of Village- Mangalpur Kala, P.S. Nautan, District- West Champaran.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajnish Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Aditya Nath Jha, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shiv Ratan Yadav
- respondent
Bishwanath Mahto
- respondent
Ratan Yadav
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court