Dismissed
Titu Badwal v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCWJC/9253/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition concerning Rural Works Department matters dismissed for default as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared on consecutive listing dates.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9253 of 2024
¶2
======================================================
¶3
Titu Badwal, Son of Late Sohan Singh, Resident of Mohallah- Professor’s Colony, Milan Patty, Kishanganj, Police Station- Kishanganj (Mufassil), District- Kishanganj (Bihar).
¶4
... ... Petitioner/s
¶5
Versus
¶6
- The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
¶7
- The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary-Cum-Additional Commissioner, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
¶8
- The Chief Engineer No. 2, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
¶9
- The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Kishanganj.
¶10
- The Technical Secretary to the Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Titu Badwal
- respondent
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department
- respondent
Prem Kumar
- respondent
Ashok Kumar (Bid ID 572126)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court