Allowed

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Feb 2023MJC/38/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order restoring Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case no. 1182 of 2022 to its original file. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution on 12.12.2022 due to unavoidable circumstances preventing the petitioner's appearance. The court deemed it fit to restore the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition C.W.J.C. no. 1182 of 2022 restored to its original file.

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.38 of 2023 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1182 of 2022

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta Son of Late Haridwar Gupta Resident of Room No.- 3, Jeevan Lalu Gupta, Jai Sevalal Nagar, Radhagram, Dhobighat, Vakola Bridge, Santacruz (East), Police Station- Vakola, Mumbai, Maharashtra- 400055.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabua.

¶8

The Court of Collector cum District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabua.

¶9

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhabua, Kaimur.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur, Bhabua.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma (AAG 3)

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 15-02-2023

¶18

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶19

learned APP for the State.

¶20

The defects, pointed out by the registry, are ignored.

¶21

The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 1182 of 2022, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution by an order dated 12.12.2022.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of unavoidable circumstances, he could not come to the Court, resulting in him not being able to attend the case, when the same was called out for hearing, thus a sympathetic view be

¶23

Patna High Court MJC No.38 of 2023(2) dt.15-02-2023 2/2

¶24

taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file.

¶25

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. 1182 of 2022, to its original file.

¶26

The present petition stands allowed.

¶27

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶28

rinkee/-

¶29

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar Haridwar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jawahar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Parma Nand Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Aarti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sunana Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ayodhya Paswan Vs The State of Bihar