Disposed

Vishal Ranjan v. The Union Of India, Through Smt. Sunita Sanghi, Director General Of Employment And Training

Patna HC25 Jul 2023MJC/3190/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a matter concerning compliance of a previous writ order regarding the Trade Instructor post advertisement, the court found that procedural requirements, including the inclusion of the post in the appointment list and rescheduling of application dates, had been met. The compliance objection was satisfied. The judge disposed of the matter accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The MJC No. 3190 of 2018 stands disposed of as the order passed by the writ Court has been complied with.

Vishal Ranjan Vs The Union Of India, Through Smt… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3190 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7890 of 2013

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Vishal Ranjan S/o Kumar Vijay Sigh R/o New Yarpur, Janta Road, Patna, Police Station-Gardanibagh, District- Patna

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Union Of India, Through Smt. Sunita Sanghi, Director General Of Employment And Training, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

¶9

State of Bihar Through Deepak Kumar, The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

¶10

Dipak Kumar Singh , Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶11

Dharmendra Singh, Director, Employement and Trainig (Training Department) Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.

¶12

Yogendra Ram, Secretary, Bihar Karmchari Chayan Ayog, P.O. Veterinary College, Patna-14

¶13

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Advocate ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶17

8 25-07-2023 Heard the parties.

¶18

The present petition is for compliance of the order passed by the writ Court in C.W.J.C. No. 7890 of 2013 by which earlier advertisement related to 'Trade Instructor' was quashed with a direction to the respondent/opposite party to publish fresh advertisement after forming guidelines.

¶19

Number of show causes/supplementary show causes has been filed and on the last occasion specific question was

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.3190 of 2018(8) dt.25-07-2023 2/3

¶21

asked to the opposite party whether the petitioner is entitled to appear pursuant to the last advertisement issued or not.

¶22

Now a supplementary show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no.3 and the petitioner has taken this Court to paragraph-7 which read as follows:

¶23

"That Bihar Technical Service Commission, Patna requested the General Administration Department to include the name of post "Trade Instructor" in the list related appointment of the Technical Service Commission and also requested to amend the appointment rules, vide its letter no. -07 dated 09.01.2020. Thereafter, the General Administration Department issued notification no. 6883 dated 03.08.2020 by which the aforesaid post of Trade Instructor was included in the list related to appointment by the Bihar Technical Service Commission. Accordingly, Bihar Technical Service Commission appointment -procedure (Amendment) Rules, 2021 has been issued vide Notification no.5214 dated 03.05.202".

¶24

Patna High Court MJC No.3190 of 2018(8) dt.25-07-2023 3/3

¶25

It is his further submission that with the help of para11 that the last date for applying online application has been rescheduled from 4.7.2023 to 3.8.2023 relating to revised Advertisement No. 07 of 2023/36/2023.

¶26

In that view of the matter and the incorporation in his supplementary show cause showing that the petitioner is eligible to appear pursuant to the advertisement and only if she/they are selected will have to complete C.I.T.S. course in their trade within three years from the date of joining for which they will be granted leave.

¶27

This Court is convinced that the order has been complied with.

¶28

The MJC No. 3190 of 2018 stands disposed of.

¶29

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶30

Ravi/-

¶31

Vishal Ranjan v. The Union Of India, Through Smt. Sunita Sanghi, Director General Of Employment And Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Ranjan v. The Union Of India, Through Smt. Sunita Sanghi, Director General Of Employment And Training

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaushal Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jawahar Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bidyut Kumar Tandon Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dr. Kalpana Shrivastava Vs Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Human Resources Department, and Ors.

Narbdeshwar Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.