The court dropped a contempt petition for non-compliance of a previous order quashing seizure. It directed the petitioner to submit a representation regarding the release of a bank guarantee.
Contempt petition dropped; petitioner directed to submit representation regarding bank guarantee release.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.232 of 2020
In
Letters Patent Appeal No.1306 of 2019
======================================================
M/s J. K. Traders, Doturi, Kawatika, Bijni, Chirang, Assam- 738390 through its Manager Allauddin Sheikh, Aged about 35 years, Male, Son of Abdus Samad, Resident of Vill/Town- (A) Doturi, (Part 2), P.S. Bijni, Sub DivisionBijni, District- Chirang (Assam).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Pandey, Adv. Mr. Thakur Rajiv Ranjan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay (A.S.G.) For the Respondent : Mr. K.N. Singh, Sr. Advocate, ASG Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC, Customs
======================================================
Patna High Court MJC No.232 of 2020(3) dt.23-06-2023 2/3
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
3 23-06-2023 The present MJC is filed for non-compliance of the order dated 20th of December, 2019, passed in LPA No. 1306 of 2019, arising out of CWJC No. 6657 of 2019. Para 50 of the order reads as under:-
“Thus, in view of our aforesaid discussions, we set aside the judgment dated 05.09.2019 passed in CWJC No. 6657 of 2019 titled as M/s. J.K. Traders & anr. Versus the Union of India & Ors. by a learned Single Judge of this Court and allow the writ petitioners’ prayer of quashing the seizure memo dated 6th of February, 2019, as also all consequential actions seizing the goods and vehicle in question, for such action to be without any basis having no mandate of law”.
Patna High Court MJC No.232 of 2020(3) dt.23-06-2023 3/3
concerned respondent in favor of the petitioner.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
Amrendra/ashish kr/-
( Jitendra Kumar, J)
U
M/s J. K. Traders
Union of India
P. B. Bajanthri
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
