authority stated to have noticed that such selection and appointment of Review-petitioner was contrary to material information. Thereafter, proceeded to terminate the service of Review-petitioner on 25.12.2007 and it was a subject-matter of C.W.J.C. No. 10272 of 2010 and it was disposed of in favour of the Review-petitioner on 13.09.2011 while setting aside the order of termination. The Review-petitioner was not taken back to duty resulted in filing MJC No. 45 of 2012. During pendency of MJC No. 45 of 2012, State-Respondent filed supplementary show cause along with documents. One of the document is relating to non-consideration of Review-petitioner's grievance on merit, stating that more merited persons have been selected and appointed. The petitioner is not one of the merited candidate so as to accommodate her. Such a decision was taken by the competent authority on 17.02.2012, resulted in dropping of MJC No. 45 of 2012.