Dismissed

Sudhir Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar through Sri Chaitanya Prasad

Patna HC20 Apr 2023MJC/1790/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order dismissing a contempt petition brought by the petitioner in Letters Patent Appeal No.1128 of 2014, as the opposite party had complied with the impugned order regarding the payment of salary and leave entitlements.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was dismissed as the opposite party had complied with the previous order.

Sudhir Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1790 of 2018

¶2

¶3

Letters Patent Appeal No.1128 of 2014

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Sudhir Kumar Sah, Son of Late Ramashish Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 6, Ambedkar Nagar, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through Sri Chaitanya Prasad Son of not known, the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Dalsingsarai Nagar Panchayat through its Executive Officer, Sri Hemant Kumar, S/o not known, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.

¶10

Sri Hemant Kumar, S/o not known, the Executive Officer, Dalsingsarai Nagar Panchayat, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Praveen, Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sinha, Adv.

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)

¶17

5 20-04-2023 The learned counsel for the parties are

¶18

present.

¶19

Though a prayer for pass over has been

¶20

made on behalf of the petitioner on the ground of illness

¶21

of the learned counsel who has to address this Court,

¶22

but after having perused the show-cause reply filed by

¶23

Patna High Court MJC No.1790 of 2018(5) dt.20-04-2023 2/2

¶24

the opposite party No. 2/the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Dalsinghsarai, it appears that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.

¶25

The petitioner has been made available a sum of Rs. 64,830/- on account of arrears of salary and Rs. 54,264/- on account of earned leave.

¶26

In that view of the matter, no ground is available as on date for keeping this contempt petition pending.

¶27

The present contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed.

¶28

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶29

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶30

Praveen-II/-

¶31

Sudhir Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar through Sri Chaitanya Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar through Sri Chaitanya Prasad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s patel Agri Industries Private Limited Vs The State of Bihar

Ishwar Chandra Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Heena Naz Vs The Bihar Public Service Commission

Chandrika Singh Vs The State of Bihar.

Dipak Kumar Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms

Pradip Kumar @ Pradip Ram Vs The State of Bihar