The Court dismissed this contempt petition after the respondent counsel stated that the impugned order had already been complied with.
petitioner granted liberty to approach the Court again if the statement of compliance is not correct.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1154 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10676 of 2017
======================================================
Dipak Kumar Thakur Son of Sri Raj Kishore Thakur Resident of Village and Post- Tira Jatmalpur, Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR)
3 20-04-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, learned counsel for
the State, however, submits that the order in question has already been complied with.
In view of the statement made by the counsel
for the State, we dismiss this contempt petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court again, if
Patna High Court MJC No.1154 of 2018(3) dt.20-04-2023 2/2
the statement made by the counsel for the State is not
correct.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
( Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/Praveen
U
Dipak Kumar Thakur
The State Of Bihar and Others
Ashutosh Kumar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
