Petitioners withdrew the writ petition on the ground that the grievance was redressed.
Permission to withdraw granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1144 of 2021
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4489 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nilanjan Chatterjee For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
Patna High Court MJC No.1144 of 2021(3) dt.17-05-2023 2/2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 17-05-2023 Mr. Sahil Kumar, learned Advocate for the
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application as the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed and this petition has become infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
krishna/-
U
Jageshwari Memorial Institute of Speech and hearing a society
Indian Bank
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
