Dismissed

Dinesh Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 May 2023CWJC/2539/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged his disengagement as a Gramin Awas Sahayak for alleged selection errors and delayed implementation. The court refused to interfere with the administrative order finding the decision informed and based on hearing.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the petitioner's writ petition challenging the order of disengagement from employment as Gramin Awas Sahayak.

Dinesh Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2539 of 2023

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dinesh Choudhary Son of Kailash Choudhary, Resident of Village Pariouna, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar.

¶8

The Joint Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶10

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Patna.

¶11

The Sub Divisional Officer, Patna Sadar.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Sampatchak, Patna.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh, Adv.

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-05-2023

¶17

We have heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar for the

¶18

petitioner and Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh for the State.

¶19

The petitioner has been disengaged from

¶20

his employment as Gramin Awas Sahayak for the reason that he had selected wrong beneficiaries under Indira

¶21

Awas Scheme and that he did not carry out the programmes with interest leading to delayed implementation.

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.2539 of 2023 dt.16-05-2023 2/2

¶23

On the aforesaid two grounds, the

¶24

District Magistrate, Patna took a decision but only after

¶25

hearing the petitioner, of disengaging him from the assignment. The Additional Secretary, Rural

¶26

Development Department has also affirmed the order passed by the Collector.

¶27

Considering the nature of accusation

¶28

against the petitioner and an informed decision by the

¶29

Collector and the Additional Secretary, Rural

¶30

Development Department, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of disengagement.

¶31

The petition is dismissed.

¶32

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶33

Mayank/Praveen

¶34

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	17.05.2023
Transmission Date	N/A

Dinesh Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kailash Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Chotu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Datt Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kiran Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bibha Devi @ Vibha Devi Vs The State of Bihar